Background

Historical Context

Obligatory Responsibilities

Why is this Process Needed?

The Te Aroturuki process assists scientists and Māori to work through the complex issues associated with controversial technologies. It is also used to capture future opportunities. <more>

Over the past decade, there have been increasing statutory requirements for scientists to consult with Māori. <more>

The success of this process is dependent on scientists taking the time to become informed about Māori cultural perspectives to ensure informed dialogue occurs.

Mutual benefits

Science offers the potential to make large contributions to Māori development. At the same time, Māori culture, world views, and mātauranga (knowledge traditions) can contribute to science in highly meaningful ways. Science can benefit from better utilising local Māori ecological knowledge, Māori language and culture, protocols for interacting with each other, and how Māori conceptualise the natural world.
However, the potential for mātauranga Māori to contribute to how science is conducted and communicated is seldom understood. <more>

Negotiating through the issues associated with engaging Māori communities in discussions about controversial technologies can be like negotiating a minefield and is challenging. Taking the time to learn about Māori values and culture and build long term relationships is essential for effective dialogue (Tipene-Matua et al). For Māori, the process respects the need to allow hapu/iwi enough time for thorough airing of the issues, to ask questions and raise concerns.

Positive and compelling reasons for scientists to engage with Maori include:

• The development of a solid long term relationships with Māori will translate into long term benefits and opportunities for research organisations and individual scientists. Such opportunities include research and business partnerships, scholarships and community development initiatives.
• Once trust between the parties is established, the ability to work towards common goals will be more easily achieved.
• Upskilling of Māori in science will increase the knowledge base of hapu and iwi.
• Promotion of science to Māori as a career option will aid recruitment in an area where Māori are substantively underrepresented (McKinley et al. 2004).
• Scientists who are confident and competent to engage Māori can draw inspiration and fulfilment from delivering science-derived benefits to diverse communities.
• A science workforce will be developed who will not be deterred by cultural barriers, but instead will enjoy taking the time to listen, learn and connect with tangata whenua.
• Similarly, science organisations will establish robust, time-tested relationships with Māori based on mutual respect and reciprocal beneficial agreements, projects and initiatives. Within these organisations, dialogue with Māori around controversial technologies can develop to the point where engagement and involvement is a routine and intricate part of daily business.